Speaker of the House of Reps, Aminu Tambuwal, has said that the
withdrawal of his security detail on the directives of the acting
Inspector General of Police (IGP), Mr Abba Suleiman, is a brazen act of
crass impunity, gross constitutional breach and contempt of court.
Tambuwal said the implication of the withdrawal is that the acting IG
has removed him as the Speaker of the House of Reps, an action that he
said is far out of his official powers of the IGP.
In a statement by his Special Adviser, Media and Public Affairs, Malam
Imam Imam, the Speaker said the action of the Acting IGP contravened the
1999 constitution.
He warned the IG to desist from assuming or usurping the constitutional functions of the Judiciary.
Below is the official statement from Speaker Tambuwal:
"The office of
the Hon Speaker House of Representatives, Rt Hon Aminu Waziri Tambuwal
has received with shock and amazement the statement issued by the
Nigerian Police Force Headquarters justifying the withdrawal of Police
Security Personnel attached to the Hon Speaker, by the Acting Inspector
General of Police.
“In the said
statement, the Force has stated to the effect that by his defection from
the PDP to the APC, the Hon Speaker is in breach of Section 68(1)(g) of
the 1999 Constitution and is consequently no longer entitled to police
security. Nothing can be further from the truth.
“The implication
of the Inspector General of Police’s statement is that as sanction for
this alleged constitutional breach, he has removed Rt Hon Aminu Waziri
Tambuwal from office of Speaker House of Representatives.
“For the
avoidance of doubt the question of whether or not there is a division or
faction in the PDP has been resolved by Lord Justice Faji of the Ilorin
Division of Federal High Court in suit FHC/IL/CS/6/2014 in which the
court held that indeed there were factions in the PDP.
“Again in suit
no FHC/S/CS/ 4/2014, the Sokoto Division of the Federal High Court per
Justice Aikawa, the judgment of the court was that there was not only
Division but faction in the PDP which later merged with the APC.
“As the number
four citizen in the hierarchy of protocol in the country, the Speaker is
entitled to security protection by the security agencies.
"Therefore, we
see the action of the Acting Inspector General of Police as not only
contempt of the courts but a ploy to bring harm to the person of Rt Hon
Aminu Waziri Tambuwal.
“We are on
authority that nothing in the 1999 Constitution nor the Police Act
confers on the police force adjudicatory powers, including the
interpretation of the constitution.
“In any case, even Section 215 of the 1999 Constitution does not
contemplate the issuing of or compliance with unlawful orders by the
President and or the the Inspector General of Police respectively.
“What the Acting Inspector General of Police has done therefore has no
basis in law, including the 1999 Constitution, which he has cited. It is
a brazen act of crass impunity, gross Constitutional breach and
contempt of court. The Inspector General should desist from assuming or
usurping the constitutional functions of the Judiciary.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the Speaker of the House is elected by
members from among themselves under Section 50(1) (b) of the
constitution and vacates office under Section 50 (2) (a) (b) &(c),
in the case of (c) by two-thirds majority of members of the House.
“The Section 68(1)(g) of the Constitution which refers to a member
vacating his seat on grounds of defection, which the Inspector General
of Police refers to,has a proviso which has been and still is a matter
for judicial and not police interpretation.
“We have faith and confidence in our judiciary and are persuaded that it cannot be stampeded into administering injustice”.
No comments:
Post a Comment